Crime and Punishment Essay :: essays research papers

By the dismiss of Dostoyeskys law-breaking and Punishment, the proofreader is no longer under the legerdemain of the possible existence of sinful men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded aces too, the book is a journey through Raskolnikovs proposed theory on crime. It is a theory based on the ideas that had been printed and read a jet times(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a Ger troops philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian fierceness on the ends rather than the means whereby a superman existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsches much selfish philosophy focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act upon in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate penalty as he realized that his existence was not that of the extraordinary man presented in his theory. In chapter five of part three in Crime and Punishment, this theor y is outlined by its creator, Raskolnikov. Such an innovative theory would distinctly have placed him in the extraordinary category, but when he fails to action its standards, by submitting to the common law through his confession, the theory crumbles right in the lead the readers eyes. The majority of Raskolnikovs theory seems logical until the reader arrives at its single essential flaw. Raskolnikovs idea that the enactment of a crime is invariably accompanied by illness(311) was one nerve of the theory which, through its accuracy in Raskolnikovs crime, seemed to lend hardiness to the entirety of the theory some(prenominal) brief experiences with faintness on the region Raskolnikovs behalf, insinuate the veracity of his ideas.After inferring from the rationality of Raskolnikovs surmise on illness that the rest of his working theory would too be correct, the reader is led down a path of definite expectations for his/her extraordinary narrator. This path would have been one whereby Raskolnikov was able to implement widespread puff up being as a result of his murders. Furthermore, he would have been able to avoid submission to the common law of the ordinary people in order to preserve his greatness. This is not, in fact, what happens though. Rather, Raskolnikov is forced to confess by several factors including the very fear of being discovered. This fear is emphasized to illustrate his sack from the extraordinary man an extraordinary man would not have have such fears since he would know that he had a right to play such actions .