Police Corruption Essay Essay

Police Corruption female genitals be defined as a form of law bobble in which law enforcement ships officers break their social contract and exclaim their mogul for personal or department gain. There are three forms of legal philosophy subversive action. These forms are Nonfeasance, which involves tribulation to perform legal duty, a nonher form is Misfeasance, which is failure to perform legal duty in a proper manner, and the tierce form is Malfeasance, which is commission of an illegal act. The three explanations of corruption are the rotten apples, departmental, and the other focuses on factors external to the department. An example of these would be an officer might feel unappreciated for their good work and actions and it might cryst entirelyize them corruptible.An example of departmental explanation would be if officers feel uncommitted and unsupported, their outlooks and value are reinforced by others in the group which whitethorn bequeath to lack of commitment in their job, thereby leading to corruption. Some police officers may abuse their power because they date stamp themselves as not enforcers of the law, barely them as the law itself. The blue bulwark of silence is a endpoint used in the United States to denote the unwritten rule that exists among officers, where they should not subject on a colleagues misconduct, errors, or crimes. This may impact an officers loyalty to their profession because they are not doing their job if they are letting another officer get by with crimes, and if they did topic it then they would be breaking their loyalty to fellow cops. Its important for officers to eat up a good ethical foundation onward they enter into this job because it would help prevent them from doing wrong and abusing their power.In the stop for Being a Mutt image, I realized how bad virtually officers can act virtuallytimes. The teen was stopped and questioned multiple times for sounding suspicious, when really they were ju st racist. They were trying to provoke the teenager to justify an arrest. I feel the form of police corruption they were doing was misfeasance. Stopping someone because of their race, when they werent committing any crimes is humiliating to that person and is wrong of any cop to abuse their power in this way. The Blue wall of silence comes up in this type of situation because some other copswitness it and knows that this goes on when officers have low numbers of stops, and they adoptt neediness to tell because they acquiret want to seem disloyal to their fellow police officers.In the Los Angeles Police Department video, they talked about the Rampart and Crash scandal. When I watched this video I was in disbelief that, that many officers were implicated in some form of misconduct. I go through that they wanted to get gangs and crimes off the bridle-path but this was no way of going about it. They would shoot or beat people when they were unprovoked. They would steal narcotics and plant false evidence, and frame suspects and hide out up all that these officers were doing because it was getting rid of the gangs and hoodlums. I cant understand how these officers didnt theorize what they were doing was wrong and immoral. This form of corruption in this particular situation was malfeasance. What they were doing was illegal, and they are here to protect and obey the law.In the Behind the Blue Wall video. I was extremely shocked to see the police brutality that occurred in these cases. I dont understand how an officer could deliberately torment a victim because of their race and work out they can get apart with what theyre doing and that it isnt wrong. Malfeasance is the form of corruption that comes up in these cases because what they are doing is illegal. The unlawful beatings and shootings of these victims, when they are not make the officers is completely wrong and these cases need to stop. The Blue wall of silence as well as comes up in these cases beca use there were officers who knew about what happened and what the other officers were doing and instead of reportage it, they attempted to cover it up.Co-workers should treat those who inform authorities of illegal activity in the police agency the same as how they treated them in the beginning they reported corruption. In the virtue ethics perspective, the habit of right desire, he was making the right choice by reporting corruption because he knew that what was going on in the agency wasnt right and compulsory to be stopped. Frank Serpicos response to this case was Its continuously worthy it to be at peace with yourself. I think this does suggest reasoning of ethical thought. Ithink Serpico meant that, as long as you feel good with what you are doing, and you are doing what you think is right, then that is all the matters.I agree with this because no matter what happens in the end, it is all worth it if you are at peace and happy with what you did. There are conflicts presente d in terms of loyalty and duty. Loyalty is a good to have, but it is not a virtue. If loyalty is treated as a virtue, it can be misguided. It will lead to protection of illegal conduct and can give into corruption. Officers may want to be loyal to fellow officers and not report what is really going on, however they also want to do their duty, and want to report because it is their duty to not participate in the corruption.The blue wall of silence impacts conflicting loyalty because it is an unwritten rule amongst officers to not report a fellow officers mistakes, misconducts, or crimes. This affects them if they want to be loyal to those officers and be loyal to their civic duty as well. If I was an officer in this situation, I would definitely report these crimes. I dont believe in the blue wall of silence. I think that if an officer is doing something illegal then it needs to be reported and dealt with. but because they are officers doesnt mean they should be able to get away wi th things that they are arresting other citizens for doing.