Preschool for all

As a father of one-third boys, ages four, two, and most lately, a two month old, I have been interested tightfitting to the grooming options available for them. It was non until I attempted to tolerate my own enquiry on the early childhood education, specifically preschool for my oldest son, thusly triple years old, did I realize the difficulty In doing so. Having been a member of The united States Air Force, I was afforded the opportunity to enroll my children into the robust, besides sometimes frustrating, Child Development Center that is established on from each one(prenominal) Air Force base.Living in a world of checklists and constant inspections, I did not worry about the quality of the plan. As I transitioned to be a civilian, my head began to swim at what is considered high quality education for my growing boys. I thought that I knew about preschools, it seemed equivalent park sense to me. After the source few classroom discussions into our exploratory resear ch papers, the overarching subject for my fellow students was Twenty First Century Families. I knew that my recent struggle would fit perfectly. counterbalanceing with only a question and without a clue, I set out to find out why here were not all affordable options for high quality preschools. The Investigation began with a talk with my wife about the topic. She reminded me that electric chair Obama spoke about this actually topic In the 2013 State of the union Address. In a barbarism that took just over an hour, chairman Beams address to the nation set forwards many challenges for recounting as well as the citizens of The united States of America. 1 challenge in particular came about half way by dint of the speech.Obama noted that although the secondary and collegiate education is some topic that should be pursed, the education of our juvenileest citizens would not e ignored by his administration. He goes on to state, Every vaulting horse we invest in high- quality e arly childhood education stack save frequently than s change surface dollars afterward on by boosting first rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime (Remarks). I fully support this Initiative by the President. It seems easy for law makers to spawn wrapped up In meeting the demands for their constituents, scarce what about the youngest constituents?It did not take me long to realize that what I thought I knew about the subject was about to get more complicated. However, for the future of my three boys, I looked deeper into the reach. To my surprise, President Obama brought up the same topic in the 2014 State of the union Address. Buried about one third of the way into the speech, President Obama transitioned into the early childhood education topic yet again. At first, I thought to myself, If he cannot push this forward, this issue must run even deeper than I thought. President Obama explains that the best investment in young childs life is one of a high-q uality education.As he brought the topic to a close in his speech, President Obama states that despite Congress stalling, thirty states have elevated pre-K funding on their own (President). He added, As Congress decides what Its going to do, Im going to pull together a coalition of elect officials, business leaders, and philanthropists willing to help more kids access the high-quality pre-K they need (President). This put me at ease, but I was convinced that President in that respect were going to be several political gains to be do if each state were to follow through with their end of the bargain.Although it seemed like a concentrated use of taxpayer funds, I was not convinced that the expenditure was worth it. magic spell I still support his proposal, I felt in that respect were more storys to the onion that needed to be led back. I still did not have an answer as to why there were not any affordable preschools that I considered to be high quality. mend I was winnow th rough 12s of abstracts through the Academic Search Complete database, there was one in particular that caught my eye from the Congressional Digest, entitled wee Childhood Education.As the third kickoff for my exploratory research paper, this clause shed some light on the record of the Universal Preschool debate. The origins of the comprehensive preschool debate began in 1965 with President Lyndon B. Johnnys foreman Start program. This eight-week summer function was aimed at low-income families with children in the kindergarten age group. It did not take long for this program to become popular both as a political topic, but also as a tool for social change. The program came at a time in America that was plagued by the war in Vietnam.Head Start grew in size over the side by side(p) 40 years. Today, there are forty-five different federal programs that provide assistance and run to families with children under the age of five. However, there is still a long-standing debate ove r the continuing performance in terms of supportive services and curriculum for children ender the age of five. There is, however, no standing debate to the powerful remarks made by President Johnson in 1965 regarding the newly true Head Start program, Children are inheritors of scantinesss curse and not its creators.Unless we act, these children will pass it on to the next generation (CTD. In Early). My thought process began to shift a little. While I did know that the Head Start program existed, I did not know that it was so closely related to preschool age children. In my experience, the Head Start program was intended for those with difficulties adapting or learning in a public school setting. Still, I peeled back another layer from this debate. Using the discovery that a large number of separate federal official programs are involved with assisting families, I sought out a source from the opposite end of the debate.The forth source I selected to help me take the debate of P reschool for both was from the National Affairs Journal. David Armor and Sonic tickle pink wrote the word, The Dubious Promise of Universal Preschool. Both authors are professors at the give instruction of Public Policy at George Mason University. I read the article with an open mind already knowing the opposing conservative tip on the Journal. David Amour and Sonic Souse recapped a brief history of the debate, also mentioning President Johnnys initial Head Start proposal in 1965. But they quickly moved on to statistics and interpreting surveys that had been conducted.I found myself victorious notes as I learned about the rapid growth in the asses of the Head Start program that ballooned from 400,000 in the asses to nearly 900,000 children (Armor Souse 37). The authors currently dive into concerns over the quality of the program, citing again the forty-five different national programs that support Head Start. They further explain hat the locally developed curriculums are fre quently pointed out as the weakness in the boilersuit program (Armor Souse). Additionally, most Head Start teachers do not background signal in childhood education with an associates degree (Armor Souse, 39).I was taken back by this discovery. The quality of instruction seemed to be directly related to the experience of its instructor. The history of the Head Start Program is and so a remarkable one. As one of the longest running Federal Government programs that attacks one of the poverty issues that exist in our country, Head Start surely has its merits and drawbacks. The idea of Preschool for All started from a modest attempt to help low-income families with small children prepare for kindergarten. It later grew into the national debate we see and participate in today.Knowing that there were indeed instances where states have had promising success, I aimed my focus at the state of Oklahoma. harmonise to an article I found in The New York Times use the database tool Lexiss, Okl ahoma Where the Kids Learn Early, two time Pulitzer Prize gentle author Nicholas Kristin depicts a story about two young girls, ages three and four aiming to break the cycle of poverty which is about so much more than a lack of money (Krzysztof. The girls great grandmother had a baby at 13, their grandmother followed with a baby at 15, the mom had her first baby by 13, born with drugs in his system (Krzysztof.I was shocked as I keep reading. The inequality of these innocent children Jumped out at me. Suddenly, the debate took a different shape. In an interview that the author conducted with Republican Tulsa urban center Council member Skip Steele, This isnt a liberal issue, he added, this is investing in our kids, in our future. Its a no- brainier (Krzysztof. While I had researched nearly a dozen sources and discussed several of them here, none put the face to the story quite like this article. It is a stark reminder that there is a face crapper all the numbers, figures, and char ts that make up statistics.The exploratory paper I began in short did not feel like an assignment anymore. It seemed like I was away of a movement for the future of our nation. After conducting the research and having time to learn the information, I still feel that Preschool for All is absolutely the right thing to do. With its earnest beginnings during the Vietnam War, to the humble town of Tulsa, Oklahoma, my Rooney throughout this exploratory paper was very interesting. I was surprised to find out that about the number of Federal government programs that have oversight in the Head Start program.