Case Study

Running head : CITY EASEMENT UTILITY LINEThe repose slip of Mr . Jonesconstructing a subdivision overthe backup city receipts argumentationAbstractThe urban center has every rightly to retrieve its ministration utility take out . It can also subscribe to Mr . Jones to demolish the subdivision at his cost . The property owner can at go around recover his payments from Mr . Jones done a court of law , if not by correlative agreement . The neighbor has no consider of damages on the basis of this episode . Since the matter comes below the jurisdiction of the democracy courts , rather than Federal courts , Mr . Jones has to defend his eluding , if needed through with(predicate) State courtsCase of Mr . JonesEasement of urban center Utility line is meshed by Mr . Jones subdivision . The metropolis council has every rig ht to infract the reflection of sub-division or for that matter to demolish the construction for recover the relievo utility line for the public .

level polish off the cost of such demolishing work has to be borne by Mr . Jones or the property owner as the City quotidian Utility Department has observed in some cases ( Holly , 2008The City is threatening to sue Mr . Jones for fraud against Municipality Mr . Jones can not be charged with an act of fraud . It is true ignorance of law is no excuse (Babstock , 2009 ) But , what Mr . Jones has done can be turn up as an unwitting act of ignorance of the fact that the City easement utitlity line is under the! constructed areaThe owner of the subdivision...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper